Upgrade laptop screen to 1080p

Is it possible to rearea a "1024 × 768" lapoptimal screen through a "1920 × 1080" model? 

The lapoptimal is a Toshiba Tecra z40-a-16z, and also I have actually discovered full HD replacement displays on ebay. 

 

The fundamental concerns are:

1. Will the higher resolution screen be supported in terms of connectors, display screen adaptor, motherboard etc?

2. Will the i5 4310U processor cope through the added strain of preserving the greater amount of pixels?

3. Has anyone tried this before, and also carry out you have any type of advice?

 

Finally this is even more of an "is it possible" question - I"m less pertained to about price effectiveness e.g. i"m conscious it may be even more wise to simply buy a new lapheight. 

 

Thanks in breakthrough,Dominic


CPU: i5 4690K
4.7GHz GPU: ASUS STRIX 2080 Super Advanced RAM: G.Skill RipjawsX 1600MHz CL9 (2x4, 8GB total) PSU: Corsair AX, 750W 80+ Gold Mobo: Gigabyte Gaming 5 Z97MX Case: Fractal Deauthorize Core 1300 Storage: 2x Samsung 850 Evo (500GB) Cooling: Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO OS: Windows 10 Pro Display:  ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q 27" 1440p 165Hz G-Sync 4ms IPS Monitor


Link to postShare on various other sites
*

Posted March 12, 2017
1 minute back, M.A.P said:

Even if you rearea it(which is not at all possible) the IGPU can"t take care of that resolution. The max resolution which suits the IGPU is 1366x768 nopoint more that. Going through even more than that will certainly result in significant lag or fps drops in applications.

You watching: Upgrade laptop screen to 1080p


What are your analysis from? I just pulled up ARK and the max resolution for that chip is 3200x2000.


Key System: Phobos

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 (8C/16T), ASRock B450 Steel Legfinish, 16GB G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000MHz, AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB (XFX), 960GB Crucial M500, 2TB Seagate BarraCuda, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations/macOS Catalina

 

Secondary System: York

Intel Core i7-2600 (4C/8T), ASUS P8Z68-V/GEN3, 16GB GEIL Enhance Corsa DDR3 1600MHz, Zotac GeForce GTX 550 Ti 1GB, 240GB ADATA Ultimate SU650, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations

 

Older File Server: Yet to be named

Intel Pentium 4 HT (1C/2T), Intel D865GBF, 3GB DDR 400MHz, ATI Radeon HD 4650 1GB (HIS), 80GB WD Caviar, 320GB Hitachi Deskstar, Windows XP Pro SP3, Windows Server 2003 R2


Link to postShare on various other sites
Member · 24,373 short articles 24,373 postsThe One and also OnlyLocation: College of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Posted March 12, 2017
3 minutes earlier, M.A.P said:

Even if you rearea it(which is not at all possible) the IGPU can not manage that resolution. The max resolution which suits the IGPU is 1366x768 nopoint even more that. 


A 4310 is more than qualified of managing multiple 1080p screens. 


PSU Tier List | CoC

Gaming Build | FreeNAS Server


Spoiler

i5-4690k || Seidon 240m || GTX780 ACX || MSI Z97s SLI Plus || 8GB 2400mhz || 250GB 840 Evo || 1TB WD Blue || H440 (Black/Blue) || Windows 10 Pro || Dell P2414H & BenQ XL2411Z || Ducky Shine Mini || Logitechnology G502 Proteus Core


Spoiler

FreeNAS 9.3 - Stable || Xeon E3 1230v2 || Supermicro X9SCM-F || 32GB Crucial ECC DDR3 || 3x4TB WD Red (JBOD) || SYBA SI-PEX40064 sata controller || Corsair CX500m || NZXT Source 210.


Link to postShare on other sites
Member · 790 articles 790 postsLocation: India
Posted March 12, 2017
1 minute ago, djdwosk97 said:

A 4310 is more than qualified of handling multiple 1080p displays. 


Yes capable of doing standard jobs nopoint even more than that. Maybe few old titles in 1080p. Graphics extensive work in 1080p is a tough project for it.


Link to postShare on other sites
Member · 6,779 articles 6,779 postsCollector of obsolete Macs
Posted March 12, 2017
Just now, M.A.P said:

Yes qualified of doing fundamental tasks nopoint more than that. Maybe few old titles in 1080p. Graphics extensive jobs in 1080p is a difficult task for it.


We"re not talking around gaming right here. You wouldn"t do that on this machine anymeans. 


Main System: Phobos

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 (8C/16T), ASRock B450 Steel Legend, 16GB G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000MHz, AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB (XFX), 960GB Crucial M500, 2TB Seagate BarraCuda, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations/macOS Catalina

 

Secondary System: York

Intel Core i7-2600 (4C/8T), ASUS P8Z68-V/GEN3, 16GB GEIL Enhance Corsa DDR3 1600MHz, Zotac GeForce GTX 550 Ti 1GB, 240GB ADATA Ultimate SU650, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations

 

Older Data Server: Yet to be named

Intel Pentium 4 HT (1C/2T), Intel D865GBF, 3GB DDR 400MHz, ATI Radeon HD 4650 1GB (HIS), 80GB WD Caviar, 320GB Hitachi Deskstar, Windows XP Pro SP3, Windows Server 2003 R2


Link to postShare on various other sites
Member · 24,373 write-ups 24,373 postsThe One and also OnlyLocation: University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Posted March 12, 2017
1 minute earlier, M.A.P said:

Yes qualified of doing standard jobs nopoint even more than that. Maybe few old titles in 1080p. Graphics extensive tasks in 1080p is a tough project for it.


GPU intensive work at 720p is likewise a challenging task for it....But someone who"s rocking a 1024x768 display screen even more than most likely isn"t looking for good performance. 


PSU Tier List | CoC

Gaming Build | FreeNAS Server


Spoiler

i5-4690k || Seidon 240m || GTX780 ACX || MSI Z97s SLI Plus || 8GB 2400mhz || 250GB 840 Evo || 1TB WD Blue || H440 (Black/Blue) || Windows 10 Pro || Dell P2414H & BenQ XL2411Z || Ducky Shine Mini || Logitechnology G502 Proteus Core


Spoiler

FreeNAS 9.3 - Stable || Xeon E3 1230v2 || Supermicro X9SCM-F || 32GB Crucial ECC DDR3 || 3x4TB WD Red (JBOD) || SYBA SI-PEX40064 sata controller || Corsair CX500m || NZXT Source 210.


Link to postShare on other sites
Member · 790 posts 790 postsLocation: India
Posted March 12, 2017
4 minutes ago, Jamiec1130 said:

What are your reading from? I just pulled up ARK and the max resolution for that chip is 3200x2000.


If you think choose that Nvidia Geforce GT 610 supports upto 4k that dosen"t mean it can perform everything in 4K. It indicates 4K is the max supported res thats it. Try running GTA SA on 1080p with it you"ll obtain approximately 30-35 via tool settings which is even more than a 10 year old title.


Link to postShare on various other sites
Member · 790 articles 790 postsLocation: India
Posted March 12, 2017
1 minute ago, djdwosk97 said:

GPU extensive jobs at 720p is additionally a hard task for it....But someone who"s rocking a 1024x768 display even more than likely isn"t looking for excellent performance. 


Thats why i said in before article that the finest resolution for it is 1366x768. It deserve to take care of 768p or 720p.


Link to postShare on other sites
Member · 6,779 articles 6,779 postsCollector of obsolete Macs
Posted March 12, 2017
3 minutes earlier, M.A.P said:

If you think prefer that Nvidia Geforce GT 610 supports upto 4k that dosen"t mean it can perform every little thing in 4K. It suggests 4K is the max supported res thats it. Try running GTA SA on 1080p via it you"ll gain roughly 30-35 with medium settings which is even more than a 10 year old title.


This lapheight isn"t a gaming machine. It"s not produced that at all. And the display screen they"re trying to gain running is 1080p, not 4k. Soptimal bringing games right into this. And why would certainly you cite a GT 610? That"s not connected at all.


Main System: Phobos

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 (8C/16T), ASRock B450 Steel Legfinish, 16GB G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000MHz, AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB (XFX), 960GB Crucial M500, 2TB Seagate BarraCuda, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations/macOS Catalina

 

Secondary System: York

Intel Core i7-2600 (4C/8T), ASUS P8Z68-V/GEN3, 16GB GEIL Enhance Corsa DDR3 1600MHz, Zotac GeForce GTX 550 Ti 1GB, 240GB ADATA Ultimate SU650, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations

 

Older File Server: Yet to be named

Intel Pentium 4 HT (1C/2T), Intel D865GBF, 3GB DDR 400MHz, ATI Radeon HD 4650 1GB (HIS), 80GB WD Caviar, 320GB Hitachi Deskstar, Windows XP Pro SP3, Windows Server 2003 R2


Link to postShare on various other sites
Member · 790 articles 790 postsLocation: India
Posted March 12, 2017
5 minutes earlier, Jamiec1130 said:

We"re not talking around gaming below. You wouldn"t perform that on this machine anyway. 


Even streaming or playing videos is a difficult project for it. Keep in mind that its a mobile processor and also not desktop computer processor. Its not as effective as desktop computer cpu.


Link to postShare on other sites
Member · 152 articles 152 postsLocation: over there
Posted March 12, 2017

I Googled the lapheight, it"s 1366*768, not 1024.

 

There"s no doubt the GPU have the right to output 1080p for daily use via no problem, however the concern I check out is that does the replacement display screen have actually the exact same screen link as the one on your laptop"s motherboard? Very frequently proprietary remedies are used below which are kinda various per model, so a display screen created a various 14" laptop can not work-related on this one, even if it is another Toshiba lapoptimal.


"AMD, you were the chosen one! You were supposed to damage the RGB, not sign up with them!"

 

Radon: Intel Core i5 4440
3.1 GHz / Kingston HyperX Fury 8GB DDR3 1600 MHz RAM / Gigabyte B85M-DS3H-A motherboard / ZOTAC GTX 960 2GB / WD Green 1TB HDD / Seasonic S12ii 430W PSU / Antec X1-T situation / LG 21.5" IPS 1080p monitor / Logitech G300s computer mouse / TVS-e Cherry MX Blue key-board.

 

Flerovium: HP ElitePublication 8470p / Intel Core i5 3210M
2.5 GHz / 8GB DDR3 1333 MHz RAM / WD Green 240GB SSD + Seagate Barracuda 500GB HDD / cheap Chinese replacement keyboard that I should remove ASAP


Link to postShare on various other sites
Member · 6,779 write-ups 6,779 postsCollector of obsolete Macs
Posted March 12, 2017
1 minute ago, M.A.P said:

Even streaming or playing videos is a challenging task for it. Keep in mind that its a mobile processor and not desktop computer processor. Its not as effective as desktop cpu.


Do you really think someone who"s had a 1024x768 (or more likely 1366x768) resolution panel would be streaming? Video playago is not a problem at all. My old Core 2 Duo chips play 1080p video fine. 


Main System: Phobos

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 (8C/16T), ASRock B450 Steel Legfinish, 16GB G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000MHz, AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB (XFX), 960GB Crucial M500, 2TB Seagate BarraCuda, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations/macOS Catalina

 

Secondary System: York

Intel Core i7-2600 (4C/8T), ASUS P8Z68-V/GEN3, 16GB GEIL Enhance Corsa DDR3 1600MHz, Zotac GeForce GTX 550 Ti 1GB, 240GB ADATA Ultimate SU650, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations

 

Older Data Server: Yet to be named

Intel Pentium 4 HT (1C/2T), Intel D865GBF, 3GB DDR 400MHz, ATI Radeon HD 4650 1GB (HIS), 80GB WD Caviar, 320GB Hitachi Deskstar, Windows XP Pro SP3, Windows Server 2003 R2


Link to postShare on various other sites
Member · 790 posts 790 postsLocation: India
Posted March 12, 2017
Just now, Jamiec1130 said:

This lappeak isn"t a gaming machine. It"s not created that at all. And the display they"re trying to get running is 1080p, not 4k. Stop bringing games into this. And why would you point out a GT 610? That"s not connected at all.


Its simply an instance. The totality community knows that it is crap.

See more: Why Does Chrome Keep Opening New Windows Rather Than Tabs? Full Fix: Chrome Keeps Opening New Tabs


Link to postShare on other sites
Member · 790 write-ups 790 postsLocation: India
Posted March 12, 2017
Just currently, Jamiec1130 said:

Do you really think someone who"s had actually a 1024x768 resolution panel would certainly be streaming? Video playago is not a trouble at all. My old Core 2 Duo chips play 1080p video fine. 


Ok then watching a video clip is not a trouble yet when you watch a video clip can you carry out any type of various other task maintaining the video in windowed mode doing other stuff?


Link to postShare on other sites
Member · 6,779 short articles 6,779 postsCollector of obsolete Macs
Posted March 12, 2017
Just currently, M.A.P said:

Ok then watching a video clip is not a problem however once you watch a video have the right to you do any type of other job keeping the video in windowed mode doing other stuff?


For me I have the right to have actually the video playing on my 1080p monitor complete display screen (1080p60 mind you) and perform some internet browsing and whatever before else on my other 1680x1050 monitor just fine. 


Key System: Phobos

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 (8C/16T), ASRock B450 Steel Legfinish, 16GB G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000MHz, AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB (XFX), 960GB Crucial M500, 2TB Seagate BarraCuda, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations/macOS Catalina

 

Secondary System: York

Intel Core i7-2600 (4C/8T), ASUS P8Z68-V/GEN3, 16GB GEIL Enhance Corsa DDR3 1600MHz, Zotac GeForce GTX 550 Ti 1GB, 240GB ADATA Ultimate SU650, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations

 

Older Documents Server: Yet to be named

Intel Pentium 4 HT (1C/2T), Intel D865GBF, 3GB DDR 400MHz, ATI Radeon HD 4650 1GB (HIS), 80GB WD Caviar, 320GB Hitachi Deskstar, Windows XP Pro SP3, Windows Server 2003 R2


Link to postShare on other sites
Member · 790 short articles 790 postsLocation: India
Posted March 12, 2017
6 minutes earlier, namandoesnotpanic said:

I Googled the lapheight, it"s 1366*768, not 1024.

 

There"s no doubt the GPU have the right to output 1080p for daily usage via no problem, however the concern I watch is that does the replacement display have actually the very same display screen connection as the one on your laptop"s motherboard? Very often proprietary solutions are offered below which are kinda different per model, so a screen created a different 14" lappeak might not job-related on this one, even if it is an additional Toshiba lappeak.


It is sort of OK for basic tasks however tinkering through the laptop computers display which is delicate could leave him a totally unusable lapoptimal unmuch less he connects it to external monitor.


Link to postShare on various other sites
Member · 3,634 short articles 3,634 postssilence! the finest noise of a computerLocation: somewbelow inbetween the US and also Asia
Posted March 12, 2017
6 minutes earlier, M.A.P said:

Even streaming or playing videos is a difficult project for it. Keep in mind that its a mobile processor and also not desktop computer processor. Its not as powerful as desktop cpu.


1 minute back, M.A.P said:

Ok then watching a video is not a problem however as soon as you watch a video have the right to you do any type of various other task keeping the video in windowed mode doing other stuff?


simply to get points ideal for you: Incorporated processor graphics even on the mobile lineup is not THAT poor as you say. Heck even minecraft runs on 1080p on max settings via 12 chunks rendering distance at great frameprices, roughly 35 fps. Video playago even in 1440p is no difficulty, 1080p outcomes in a modest 15% fill average max.

AND I"m inputting this on a fhd display running off of the igpu of a 5200u, it is a bit more recent and also much better, yet even older laptop computers have no trouble with that in my family members. I even have the right to edit and render videos through decent workflow on it without any troubles.

 


GUITAR BUILD LOG FROM SCRATCH OUT OF APPLEWOOD

 

- Ryzen Build -

R5 3600 | MSI X470 Gaming Plus MAX | 16GB CL16 3200MHz Corsair LPX | Dark Rock 4

MSI 2060 Super Gaming X

1TB Intel 660p | 250GB Kingston A2000 | 1TB Seagate Barracuda | 2TB WD Blue

be quiet! Silent Base 601 | be quiet! Straight Power 550W CM

2x Dell UP2516D

 

- First System (Retired) -

Intel Xeon 1231v3 | 16GB Crucial Ballistix Sport Dual Channel | Gigabyte H97 D3H | Gigabyte GTX 970 Gaming G1 | 525 GB Crucial MX 300 | 1 TB + 2 TB Seagate HDDbe quiet! 500W Straight Power E10 CM | be quiet! Silent Base 800 with stock fans | be quiet! Dark Rock Modern C1 | 2x Dell UP2516D

Reviews: be quiet! Silent Base 800 | MSI GTX 950 OC

 


Link to postShare on other sites
Member · 101 write-ups 101 posts
Posted March 12, 2017(edited)

Yes you have the right to execute it, offered the VGA controller plug is the exact same, i"ve done it on 3 various series laptop computers efficiently by buying the LCD that comes from a greater version including LVDS. Your CPU/iGPU will have no worry whatsoever running 1080p, streaming 1080p, multitasking at 1080p and supports almost up to 4k resolution output to external display screen. You will not have the ability to game very well on it, yet you have never asked to execute so. I imply rebrowsing the connector, if its the exact same purchase it, plug it in to the LCD port wright here your existing screen is, and also test a boot. If it functions, it functions, if not re list it on eBay.

Edited March 12, 2017 by toastfacegrillah
i7 3820 3.6GHZ
4.5GHZ w H60SE Water Loop - ASUS P9X79 PRO - ASUS Strix R9 390x
1200 Core Clock - 16GB DDR3 Kingston Hyper X H20
2400 - 2X 250GB Samsung EVO 850 - 4x 1TB HDD RAID0 - Corsair Obsidian 900 - Corsair 650w PSU - Samsung SA950 27"
138hz (+18hz OC FTW)
Link to postShare on other sites
Member · 3,634 posts 3,634 postssilence! the best noise of a computerLocation: somewhere inin between the US and also Asia
Posted March 12, 2017
3 minutes back, M.A.P said:

tinkering with the laptop computers screen which is fragile might leave him a completely unusable lappeak unless he connects it to exterior monitor.


that is an additional story


GUITAR BUILD LOG FROM SCRATCH OUT OF APPLEWOOD

 

- Ryzen Build -

R5 3600 | MSI X470 Gaming Plus MAX | 16GB CL16 3200MHz Corsair LPX | Dark Rock 4

MSI 2060 Super Gaming X

1TB Intel 660p | 250GB Kingston A2000 | 1TB Seagate Barracuda | 2TB WD Blue

be quiet! Silent Base 601 | be quiet! Straight Power 550W CM

2x Dell UP2516D

 

- First System (Retired) -

Intel Xeon 1231v3 | 16GB Crucial Ballistix Sport Dual Channel | Gigabyte H97 D3H | Gigabyte GTX 970 Gaming G1 | 525 GB Crucial MX 300 | 1 TB + 2 TB Seagate HDDbe quiet! 500W Straight Power E10 CM | be quiet! Silent Base 800 via stock fans | be quiet! Dark Rock State-of-the-art C1 | 2x Dell UP2516D

Reviews: be quiet! Silent Base 800 | MSI GTX 950 OC

 


Link to postShare on various other sites
Member · 790 articles 790 postsLocation: India
Posted March 12, 2017
Just now, 19_blackie_73 said:

just to gain things appropriate for you: Incorporated processor graphics also on the mobile lineup is not THAT poor as you say. Heck even minecraft runs on 1080p on max settings through 12 chunks rendering distance at good frameprices, roughly 35 fps. Video playago also in 1440p is no problem, 1080p outcomes in a modest 15% pack average max.

AND I"m inputting this on a fhd display screen running off of the igpu of a 5200u, it is a little more recent and also much better, but even older laptop computers have actually no trouble with that in my family. I even can modify and also render videos via decent workcirculation on it without any type of problems.

 


I pointed out that for doing standard work it is ok and also possibly few modeprice tasks. Ok I agree that tright here is no problem through video playago.


Link to postShare on various other sites
Member · 6,779 articles 6,779 postsCollector of obsolete Macs
Posted March 12, 2017
4 minutes back, M.A.P said:

It is kind of OK for standard tasks however tinkering through the laptop computers screen which is delicate can leave him a fully unusable laptop unless he connects it to external monitor.


I don"t know about you, but messing with this kind of stuff isn"t that difficult for many human being. 


Main System: Phobos

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 (8C/16T), ASRock B450 Steel Legend, 16GB G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000MHz, AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB (XFX), 960GB Crucial M500, 2TB Seagate BarraCuda, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations/macOS Catalina

 

Secondary System: York

Intel Core i7-2600 (4C/8T), ASUS P8Z68-V/GEN3, 16GB GEIL Enhance Corsa DDR3 1600MHz, Zotac GeForce GTX 550 Ti 1GB, 240GB ADATA Ultimate SU650, Windows 10 Pro for Workstations

 

Older File Server: Yet to be named

Intel Pentium 4 HT (1C/2T), Intel D865GBF, 3GB DDR 400MHz, ATI Radeon HD 4650 1GB (HIS), 80GB WD Caviar, 320GB Hitachi Deskstar, Windows XP Pro SP3, Windows Server 2003 R2


Link to postShare on various other sites
Member · 790 short articles 790 postsLocation: India
Posted March 12, 2017
Just now, 19_blackie_73 said:

that is an additional story


But that Laptop"s life changing story.


Link to postShare on other sites
Member · 24,373 short articles 24,373 postsThe One and OnlyLocation: University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Posted March 12, 2017
14 minutes ago, M.A.P said:

Even streaming or playing videos is a hard task for it. Keep in mind that its a mobile processor and also not desktop processor. Its not as powerful as desktop computer cpu.


Except it"s even more than enough to take care of multiple 1080p monitors playing videos.


PSU Tier List | CoC

Gaming Build | FreeNAS Server


Spoiler

i5-4690k || Seidon 240m || GTX780 ACX || MSI Z97s SLI Plus || 8GB 2400mhz || 250GB 840 Evo || 1TB WD Blue || H440 (Black/Blue) || Windows 10 Pro || Dell P2414H & BenQ XL2411Z || Ducky Shine Mini || Logitech G502 Proteus Core


Spoiler

FreeNAS 9.3 - Stable || Xeon E3 1230v2 || Supermicro X9SCM-F || 32GB Crucial ECC DDR3 || 3x4TB WD Red (JBOD) || SYBA SI-PEX40064 sata controller || Corsair CX500m || NZXT Source 210.


Link to postShare on various other sites
Page 1 of 2

Create an account or authorize in to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment


Create an account

Sign up for a brand-new account in our community. It"s easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Alprepared have an account? Sign in here.

See more: Download Ti Notefolio Creator Windows 7 Saving Issues, Ti Notefolio™ Creator For Windows®

Sign In Now
Share
Followers2
Go to topic listingDisplays

Topics


play_circle_filled
*

Latest From Linus Tech Tips:

Roasting Your WORST Setups


play_circle_filled
*

Latest From Tech Quickie:

Why TVs Are SO CHEAP


play_circle_filled
*

Latest From TechLinked:

Xbox won the Consingle War.


play_circle_filled
*

Latest From ShortCircuit:

Using a Touchscreen on a MacBook Pro!


play_circle_filled
*

Latest From Channel Super Fun:

I tricked my coworker #Shorts


DIY Laptop Display upgrade ("1024 × 768" to "1920 × 1080"
Theme Day Theme (Default)Night Theme

Linus Media GroupPowered by Invision Community